How to Compare Bitcoin and Bitcoin Cash (and Bitcoin Gold)

Some argue that Bitcoin Cash is “better” than Bitcoin because it often has faster transactions, lower fees, and is more profitable to mine. This argument is however misleading.

While it is true that Bitcoin Cash generally has lower fees (here and now with both coins in their current state), both Bitcoin and Bitcoin cash have rather slow transactions, high fees, and suffer from mining not being all that profitable for the average Joe compared to other coins.

In other words, there is a better crypto out there when it comes to each metric Bitcoin and Bitcoin Cash fight about.

For example, Litecoin has faster speeds and lower fees, meanwhile you can see a list of profitable coins to mine here… Bitcoin Cash isn’t anywhere near the top of the list.

Meanwhile, some complain that Bitcoin is too centralized, that Bitcoin Core’s team is somehow too powerful.

However, Bitcoin Cash is even more centralized, and their core team are some of the most powerful holders and miners in the world.

Most of Bitcoin Cash mining is done out of Korea and the bulk of the coin is owned by just a few people (in fact two notable people, Jihan Wu and Roger Ver [follow them on Twitter if you’d like to hear their side], control so much of the Cash and Hash they are almost household names in the Bitcoin community).

So I mean, do you want your coin centralized in New York and San Fran or Korea?

If the answer is “neither,” than you are in luck, as there are like 2,000 cryptos to choose from (including Bitcoin Gold, a coin that tries to solve the mining problem by returning power to the hands of regular people… although, again, other cryptos already solve this problem).

Meanwhile, if the answer to who gets to control mining power and such is “who cares,” then both Bitcoin and Bitcoin Cash have their pros and cons.

Just look at Bitinfocharts, or just try to send / mine some Bitcoin and Bitcoin Cash at the same time. You’ll see a difference, but it isn’t a big difference.

However, compare that with Ethereum, Bitcoin Gold, Dash, Litecoin (and the countless other cryptos like Zcash and Monero)… and you’ll see how absurd it is to use the “faster transactions, lower fees, and is more profitable to mine” argument like Bitcoin and Bitcoin Cash exist in isolation.

Why compare one granny smith apple to a slightly different granny smith when the reality is there is a whole orchard here?

The bottom line is that, while Bitcoin Cash has some features that beat Bitcoin on the average day, it isn’t “better” by every metric and meanwhile…. NEITHER Bitcoin nor Bitcoin Cash beat out other top coins on every metric.

Instead, as noted, some coins are better for some things, other coins are better for other things. They all pair nicely on a good day, but of course, the past few month haven’t all been filled with nice and good days.

In other words, the coins only work well together when a few people in Korea aren’t trying to destroy Bitcoin and claim Bitcoin Cash is the real Bitcoin. At times like those it divides the community and the average investor tends to lose money (while the luckily few will make unreal profits by buying and selling at the right time).

Anyways, the point here being: the idea that Bitcoin Cash is somehow “so much better” than Bitcoin that everyone should dump Bitcoin and go to Bitcoin Cash (like Ver’s recommends)… is essentially propaganda pushed by the Bitcoin Cash team.

In other words, the story here isn’t about Bitcoin being dead or Bitcoin Cash being a joke. Its about a bunch of cranky pants whales (people who hold a ton of Bitcoin / control a bunch of mining power) who can’t play nice together on Bitcoin’s main blockchain… thus have figured out a way to get insanely rich at everyone’s expense by forking around (creating an environment where they have a win-win, they either win by increasing the value of Cash, or win by betting on the volatility they create).

NOTE: If you think I’m being a little harsh on Bitcoin Cash, read this article, or this article, or this article, or this article, or in this one (or this one; you should really read that one). When people plot and then blitz everyone with a strategy without warning and upon that event Bitcoin plummets in price and Bitcoin Cash is pumped (and thus many normal people lose money)…. how can one not be a little harsh about those events?

Now, to be fair, the idea that Bitcoin Cash shouldn’t be taken seriously isn’t fair. Also, the idea that forks in general aren’t legitimate isn’t exactly fair.

I actually support the concept of forks and Cash. I think that those who can’t agree should be able to break off and compete with Bitcoin. Healthy competition makes both coins stronger, gives “free coins” to Bitcoin holders, and gives users an other alternative.

My issue isn’t with the concept of a fork, it is the idea that a fork would come along only to use shady tactics to try to destroy the main chain. That isn’t friendly competition. Likewise, my point isn’t that a given forked coin doesn’t have its perks, it is that in this case the Cash fork isn’t not inherently superior to the main chain in every respect.

Bitcoin Cash is a carbon copy of Bitcoin with a few tweaks. Just like Bitcoin Gold, it is essentially a slight variation of Bitcoin with its own pros and cons. Same goes for other coins that fork (for example this was true for Ethereum and Ethereum Classic).

Unfortunately, as eluded to above already, one con of Bitcoin Cash is that it is maliciously trying to destroy Bitcoin at everyone’s expense (even going as far to wait until a weekend night while the U.S. was out to dump Bitcoin and pump Bitcoin Cash… that is pretty below the belt tactics there). That sort of toxic behavior is as big a con as the slow transactions of Bitcoin are.

And, how can a reasonable person claim that something with that big a con is “better?”

If you run DDoS style attacks on Bitcoin to slow down its transactions to prove that Bitcoin Cash has faster transactions, what have you accomplished? If you would do this, then how is your centralized oligarchy any different from what some claim Core is? See where I’m going here?

The term “better” may be somewhat semantical, but still, how can a reasonable and logical person call something that has shown malicious intent a few times already in its short lifespan “better.” That is like saying a foreign knock-off of a popular social media site or search engine is better because it has faster load times… fine, ok, maybe a bit… but not really though. That is, maybe by some metrics, but not by every metric.

In other words, one is justified in arguing for transaction fees, speeds, or mining, that is a fine argument.

However, one is better off arguing that each coin has its own perks, that the coins work best in tandem and in healthy competition (sans the manipulation and grey hat tactics), and that coins that try to make their mark in the sand at the expense of others should not be rewarded by the community.

If you ask me to choose between Bitcoin and Bitcoin Cash, I’ll tell you my answer: As King Solomon would say, “Ether, Litecoin, Dash, Bitcoin Gold, etc.” I.e. any other decent coin that isn’t going to ask my to cut a baby in half.

Otherwise, since I don’t buy into the idea that I have to choose, I would say Bitcoin is a good bet for the time being, it is the most useful crypto on the planet in that is the name brand coin everyone knows and will accept in trade for other coins.

Meanwhile, I while I do think its reasonable to hold Bitcoin Cash as a hedge, I would not suggest supporting it with all your weight until they start playing nice (but do your own research and make your own investment choices; see the disclaimer in the sidebar).

If the community rewards forks that use grey area tactics to try to destroy the main chain, if we show that you can use social media to spread  FUD and win, then we will get more and more forks and FUD in the future. Its not a great precedent to set (not for Bitcoin’s main chain, and not for the Bitcoin Cash chain… as their coin can also be forked with).

Consider, when you buy Bitcoin Cash… you are often buying it with Bitcoin (or the Korean won). Little things like this are worth thinking about. There is nothing wrong with the Korean won, but like, there is nothing wrong with Bitcoin either. Actually both are very useful for what they are. That, you know, being the point.

TIP: See a basic comparison of the current forks here (note that Segwit2x and Diamond haven’t been fully confirmed to be real yet). Each fork offers something a little different, but its hard to argue any given fork is better in every respect. And this only becomes more true as updates like Segwit and the Lightening network (and the fact that future updates are possible) are considered. If Bitcoin is dead because Bitcoin Cash is better… then I mean, look at Bitcoin Diamond, it is even better than that. So, [assuming BCD ends up being legit] is Bitcoin Cash already dead? And, will the next fork kill BCD?… Or, should we all just be stoked we now have some different choices and some free coins. One path has a good vibe, the other seems messy.

Bitcoin Forks Compared. Chart from Bitcoin Diamond site.

TIP: To compare each coin in terms of its metrics like fees, speeds, profitability, and the centralization of ownership of coins and hash rates, see It takes a minute to understand what you are looking at, but even a novice can see that for anything Bitcoin Cash has on Bitcoin, another coin beats both on that same metric. I don’t think playing that game is going to do either Bitcoin many favors. We want wider adoption of crypto and a bigger market cap, not just games that shift around winners and losers, right?

Get $10 in free Bitcoin when you sign up at Coinbase and buy or sell $100 in Cryptocurrency

"Is Bitcoin Cash Better Than Bitcoin?" contains information about the following Cryptocurrencies:

Bitcoin (BTC), Bitcoin Cash (BCH) + Bitcoin SV (BSV)

What do you think?

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

nico on

Very interesting and convincing. I just convert back my little bitcoincash to bitcoin. Not playing in that ugly game again…And I will even borrow the bitcoincash wallet, keeping the bitcoingold’s one,..With ethic and conscience… Thank you

Thomas DeMichele on

I don’t want to turn people away from Bitcoin Cash as an investment in their portfolio. I just want to help people understand the pros and cons of each coin.

There is nothing wrong with keeping some Bitcoin Cash as a hedge or as an alternative investment. I am concerned however that misinformation spread around social media led to people, for example, dumping Bitcoin at $5,500 the other week and jumping 100% into Bitcoin Cash at $2,500. Those people got burned hard, that isn’t fair to the average person.

I personally think there is wisdom in retaining a little bit of each forked coin as a hedge. I even think there is wisdom in supporting Cash once it finds its sea legs and stops the grey hat tactics (like claiming Bitcoin is dead, using a site called and other forks like Bitcoin Classic to make it appear as if more than one person agreed Bitcoin Cash was a good idea, and, as far as I can tell, spurring on a very grey area pump and dump at the expense of many in the crypto community).

If people have to those facts and go all in on Bitcoin Cash anyways, I support that. I just don’t want people making choices they regret based off misinformation or a lack of information. Sort of flies in the face of the idea of the site offering “cryptocurrency facts.”

JJM on

It has become apparent to me that practical performance is the real issue here. The claim in efficiency and performance are just claims really. The further down the ladder you get, the more true the claims are. In better words. Big fat coins like BTC, BCH, ETH, and LTC are NOT the future. The are the beginning only. They helped pave the way. As time goes by, the smaller coins will rise to the top. By then they will have figured out the best way to make things work to keep up with supply and demand. In other words, they will function just as crypto was intended.

For now, we will continue to see big coins struggle. BTC, BCH, ETH are plagued by high fees and very slow delivery times. LTC is beginning to show bloat already. This foreshadows the fact that none of the close runner ups will make it high like BTC. Because they will fail before they get there.

The only type of coin that can make it that high and not have performance or cost issues will be one that is already so efficient that its nearly instant. Ripple is a prime example. It delivers on its promise. Gets from point A to B instantly. And is CHEAP CHEAP in cost. It can outrun and outperform Bitcoin any day of the week. And there are many others as well. Verge. NEM. Tronix. Waves. Just to name a few.

Thomas DeMichele on

I agree with this in many ways, but not in every way.

In the crypto economy, in terms of investing and usage, there is a need for different types of digital assets with different types of features. One feature is trust and recognition, in this Bitcoin wins the day. In terms of speed, well I mean Ripple (it has the recognition and the speed).

Then you can go down the list down to Verge, NEM, Tron, Waves, etc.

Remember though, all these coins can be updated…. and this is one of the things that throws off the argument for Bitcoin Cash for me. The reality is I can make a case for and against Bitcoin or any of its hard forks. Then part of the case to make is that they can each themselves be updated.

I’m not sure which coins are going to be leaders in the future, but I wouldn’t think that we should judge a coin based solely on price.

I don’t treaet physical gold, real estate, a rare comic book, a credit card, and checkbook the same way in real life, I don’t look at Apple, Johnson and Johnson, Square, Black Rock, and the S&P the same way on the market, and I don’t look at Bitcoin, NEM, Ripple, and Litecoin (or whatever spread we want to denote) the same way in crypto.

I think its a mistake to assume that one feature alone, for example: security, popularity, ease of use, value over time, transaction speed, transaction fees, underlying tech (like blockchain vs. other solutions) is the only thing to look at. Instead we want to consider a range of factors to get a sense of which coins will be top coins in which ways.

When you start thinking like that, and when you look at all the upcoming BTC forks, you have to really question this idea that Bitcoin Cash will somehow take over. Instead, I think Bitcoin will keep forking and each fork will be a unique asset standing on its own two legs (or falling on its own face) just like every other coin in the space. Over time the ones that have enough to offer will do well, the ones that can’t keep up (with updates and with what they already have brought to the table) will not do as well.

Meanwhile, there is always the chance that the biggest player in the future isn’t out yet. Maybe SuperBitcoin is the best, maybe ADA becomes the industry leader, maybe its a coin that hasn’t even been created yet, maybe Ethereum gets an upgrade that causes it to take the #1 spot in terms of value?

Who knows. Good thoughts. Lots of coins can preform the current iteration of Bitcoin, but its software, it can be updated and forked. As long as its producing forks, like a tree growing fruit, we cannot and should not discount it. Consider, just one of its Apples, Bitcoin Cash, is valued at over $3k! That is not something you want to dismiss.